Is HeroPoker just marketing or is it really built differently?

[Femoneji77]

Hey folks, I’ve been digging into different poker AI setups lately and I’m curious if anyone here has actually tested strategies across multiple formats like HeroPoker, NLH, PLO, or Omaha? I’ve mainly played NLH myself, but I’m starting to explore other formats and would love to hear what kind of differences you’ve noticed when it comes to how AI handles the decision-making in each. Is HeroPoker just marketing or is it really built differently?

[Weltz Clara]

Hey, great question. I’ve spent the last 3 months running tests on both NLH and PLO using an AI assistant during low-stakes tourneys. From my experience, the strategy depth differs a lot. NLH bots tend to stick closer to GTO-based decisions, while PLO bots are more exploit-heavy — probably due to the hand complexity and variance. HeroPoker mode is actually pretty interesting. It’s not just flash — it blends exploitability metrics with dynamic opponent profiling. You’ll notice it starts adjusting more aggressively after a few orbits. I’ve been using the version over at https://aipokerbot.com/ — they support all those modes and even have a stealth option if you’re worried about detection. I tried running the bot on 4 tables (mixing NLH and PLO) and noticed HeroPoker mode really shines when the pool is weak-tight. Wouldn’t trust it 100% in higher-stakes, though. Curious to hear others’ take.

[Eneria12]

Interesting thread. I’ve mostly stuck to Omaha recently, and while I haven’t used HeroPoker mode yet, I can definitely say AI struggles more with the post-flop variance in PLO. Helps to know how to override when needed.

[Author]

Posts