Home Forums Coloring IFS Managed Services

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #482313
      Giyab55715
      Participant

      I’d like to ask a question for those who already have practical experience with IFS Managed Services. We’re currently considering this option for supporting and maintaining our IFS system and are trying to understand how viable it is in the long term. I’m interested in what specific services you’ve received in practice: is it more about technical support (incidents, updates, administration), or is the IFS team actually involved in developing the solution, optimizing business processes, and customizing it? What about SLAs—are they met, and how quickly do they respond to critical incidents and business requests?

    • #482324
      Titaktitak
      Participant

      We’ve been using IFS managed services for several years now, so I can share some practical experience. In our case, this proved to be a viable and strategically sound support model. You can get details on IFS integration cost on this website. Initially, our collaboration was indeed focused more on classic technical support: incident handling, environment stability monitoring, administration, and installing updates and patches. However, over time, the model significantly expanded and became more collaborative. The IFS team wasn’t limited to a “support desk” role. Their specialists actively participated in analyzing our architecture, helped optimize system performance, made recommendations for using standard functionality instead of custom modifications, and participated in configuring solutions for changing business processes. In certain projects, they effectively worked as an extension of our internal team, understanding the industry specifics and the company’s long-term goals.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.